Recently I opened up my Facebook page and
found an interiors shop I like featuring a brand new artist. The painting
looked very familiar, and I thought, “That’s Artist X!”
But when I read the post, it wasn’t Artist
X, it was a brand new artist. So brand new, she didn’t even have a web page
yet, but she did have a Pinterest page, and guess what? Artist X is an artist
she admires! Admires so much apparently, that she doesn’t mind completely
ripping her off and then selling the work.
The issue of copying and copyright is one
that affects musicians, writers and artists. With the internet, it’s much
easier to find ideas. Musicians are the most protected, you can't even quote song lyrics without permission but riffs are harder to prove. While exact plagiarism is easy to trace, writers have more difficulty protecting their ideas, thus the more than 50 copiers of 50 Shades of Grey. Most artists can’t be bothered pursuing expensive or
time-consuming legal action, and the copiers get away with it. In addition, people seem to believe that
because they live far away from the original artist it’s not really theft. But
the internet also makes it easier to get caught.
In recent conversations with a leather
artisan and a jewellery maker, both found people making replicas of
their work. In gentle communications with either the store or copier, both were
told that the work “wasn’t exactly the same.” The artisans had a sad
resignation when they told me their stories. I think they felt abused, but
didn’t want to drain their creative energies going after the offenders. But the
sadness remained as they told their stories. Many artists have also told me that
etsy is a ground zero for copiers' inspirations.
Certainly, copying is a good way to learn.
Copying was one of the original methods of teaching drawing, which you can still see in
museums to this day. If I see an artwork I like, I analyze right away why the
composition is pleasing to me or why the size/palette/medium works. I have even
done works “in the manner” of artists like Basquiat or Wayne Thiebaud. Some
were for school assignments and others were experiments.
Any artist is visually inspired. I have
seen motifs on damask fabrics or on antique tiles, and then used them in my
work. I have seen colour combinations I liked, and created a palette around
them. When am I crossing the line into copying?
Since I’m standing here on a soapbox, I
should confess one case, from my own practice, where I might be accused of
copying. I have long admired the work of Richard Diebenkorn. I like his use of
subtle image under thin paint, his switching between representation and
abstraction, his colours, and his composition. In fact, I liked his
compositional form so much, that I did a one-page art school assignment on it.
Then a year later, I did this painting:
lines revealed |
Ocean Park 116 by Richard Diebenkorn |
I wasn’t consciously thinking about
Diebenkorn when I did the top painting layer, and but certainly there’s no
question that there is a resemblance in terms of the final composition and
palette. I didn’t copy a single painting, more like I took everything I liked
about him, stuffed it in a blender and spewed out this painting. Then, I added
my own technique of ripping away the surface and created the exposed wood,
randomness, energy, and layering that can be found in most of my art. Originally, I
had intended to paint more layers on top, but the composition was so pleasing
that I stopped right there. I resined the work, and then featured it in an open
studio. It wasn’t until someone mentioned that it reminded them of Diebenkorn,
that I realized the resemblance.
So is the final painting mine or a homage? I
guess that is debatable, but the fact I even have to ask the question, means
that it’s too close. Since then, I have learnt to ask myself if there are visible
influences in my work, and if there are I obliterate them. As artists we are visually stimulated and have great
visual memories, and we have to make sure that we are not unconsciously copying
another’s style or content. If we are consciously
copying, a pox on us.
When I first found the copier, I was
incensed. I had made the connection that others might not, given that the
copier is in Australia and the original artist is not hugely famous. I wanted
to email everyone involved, the store, the artist, the copier and the art
website which originally featured the artist. In fact, I wrote a whole post, exposing her and other artists I've recently found who copy. But when I talked with my good friend, who also happens to
be a life coach, she asked what exactly I was trying to accomplish. Did I want to humiliate and shame artists?
I realized that what I really wanted was prevention:
for all artists not to copy each other’s imagination. First I needed to look at
myself and see if I could pass scrutiny, and if not then I don’t get to throw
the first stone. We can definitely get inspired by work we see and learn from
it. Goodness, artists teach workshops so we can learn their technique. We can copy at first, but then we have to stay in the studio and push the
work until it becomes our own.
In this case, I noticed that the copier’s
work was not as good as the original, she had copied the motifs and techniques,
but was missing the random and aged qualities that made the originals
sparkle. Still I feel sorry for whoever buys the painting. They own a hollow artwork which lacks its own
creative spirit.
A very thoughtful analysis of a difficult topic, I'm sure, for any creative person: where to draw the line between inspiration and appropriation.
ReplyDeleteThere are so many questions around appropriation, from using photos as painting sources, to collage resources or digital manipulation. Maybe we can only judge from the final product, and whether it has evolved sufficiently from the original source to be original again.
DeleteGreat article, with lots for me to think about. I really believe intention has a lot to do with it; is the copier intending to create a fraud or was the intention to come up with something new?
ReplyDeleteThere will probably never be a firm line drawn in the sand, although the courts have had to draw those lines. George Harrison lost a plagarism case many years ago for his song 'My Sweet Lord', because three chords were identical to the 1963 Chiffons' song 'He's So Fine'. The judge said that although it had been entirely subconscious, it was still too similar, and Harrison lost his case. 'My Sweet Lord' is still a great song (George was always my favourite Beatle :) and to my mind a better song than 'He's So Fine'. George Harrison had absorbed the song, along with the hundreds of others he'd listened to, and when he went to write his own songs put an entirely new stamp on it, those three chords notwithstanding. For starters, who else could write a catchy pop song about Lord Krishna and have the world humming along with him?
As a writer, the only time I worry about copying is when I'm putting researched work into my fiction. I make notes, but I always worry that when I add them to my story I might subconsciously write it the way I read it. I don't worry about it with my fiction otherwise because I am so longwinded there's no room for anyone else's style to make an appearance!
Definitely we are subconsciously influenced by everything we take in, our reading, our viewing, our listening. But perhaps intention is becoming easier to discern. Since we expose ourselves in so many ways online, it becomes actually possible to trace our thinking through the various social media we use. Anyone can tell where we've been, what books we've read, what photos we've seen, what artists we love...something a little scary to consider.
Delete